🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.