Skip to content
Elite Point Zone is a premier blog offering high-quality ar…

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Determine President Trump's Legacy - as well as the United States' Role in the Global Order

In the wake of launching a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the nation-building arena.

In a remarkable media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president declared that US military forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then said that a delegation featuring Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the troubled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "managing the nation" actually means is ambiguous, but the pledge marks an dramatic shift in direction for the president, rife with contradictions and significant challenges.

A president who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who sharply criticised past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America first" international policy is now betting his presidency on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been eroded by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly upbeat.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this would be no different. He pledged to enlist American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, providing funds for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude sending American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has shown that he is quite prepared to use armed force worldwide.

In the past week, he authorized air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, suspected drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike previous actions, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that reduce the risk of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are markedly different.

His aim, he said during his briefing, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Domestic and International Reaction

That twist on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra may be tough for some of Trump's followers to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his political base, was swift to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's never ending military aggression and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to pay for it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to retake seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it ensured US regional security and provided a steady source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US supremacy in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect trade, land and resources that are fundamental to our national security." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will raise broader concerns in global politics, however, and affect American ties with the world's other significant military powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a reckless attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia after its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a peace deal between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed concern about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"America should not be administering other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a autocrat with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's choice not to inform legislative leaders prior to launching the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and uphold democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a triumph – with no American casualties and minimal harm to US equipment. Trump, with his typical confidence, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "one of the most astonishing, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competency in American history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that victory enduring, as the US claims it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unclear. He and his administration must strengthen a nation that has been in chaos for decades while calming a region that is sure to be cautious of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

About the author

Justin White

Lena Visser is a seasoned writer with a passion for exploring the intersection of technology and everyday life, bringing fresh perspectives to a global audience.

Elite Point Zone

Type to search articles.